Follow us on Twitter
protocolpedia available App store
protocolpedia android market

Protocolpedia - The Encyclopedia Of Lab Protocols

  • Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size
Powered by Sobi2Search

 

Farnham lab,UC Davis    Roe's lab,Univ of Oklahoma     Dr. Roth, UC Davis     Dr. Hennighausen,NIH/NIDDK     Dr. Shivdasani,Harvard Medical school     Dr. Mirmira University of Virginia     Dr. Herman, Kansas State Univ     Dr. Shiraishi,Kyoto University     Dr Pikaard Indiana Univ                            

Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?

DNA yields after Bisulfite Treatment
(1 viewing) (1) Guest
Go to bottomPage: 1
TOPIC: DNA yields after Bisulfite Treatment
#279
DNA yields after Bisulfite Treatment 1 Year, 7 Months ago Karma: 0
hello viewers,

Just treated my DNA with the BS Modification Kit from Sigma Aldrich.

I did a spec: the DNA concentration came to 6.310 ug/ml, Protien -9.439, DNA/Protien Ratio was .286.

The values I started with:

DNA Ratio: 1.714 DNA concentration: 50.28 ug/ul Protien: 3.553 ug/ul

I'm running a PCR tomorrow, and hopefully I will get bands.. but can anyone please share some insights on how to optimize this better?

It was suggested that run more cycles..what do you guys think about it?

Kindly help me
Please login or create an account to join this discussion.
 
#331
Re: DNA yields after Bisulfite Treatment 1 Year, 4 Months ago Karma: 0
Hope it will give some ideas. The bisulfite conversion degrades dna so that´s why a great amount of your input dna will be lost. Converted dna cannot be quantified by spectrophotometry as it is no longer double-stranded (complementarity is lost ddue to conversion). You often have to perform two rounds of pcr to get visible bands after agarose gel electrophoresis.


Please login or create an account to join this discussion.
 
#378
Re: DNA yields after Bisulfite Treatment 1 Year, 2 Months ago Karma: 0
hello everyone,

I'm new at this methylation-related stuff. When you use nanodrop in 33 (SS mode), what would be the number to look for in the 260/280 and 260/230? Is it also ~1.8 like DNA in double strand mode? I did measurement with factor 33, but it spits out bizarre number on those absorbance ratios which makes me think my conversion was bad. Hope you can share some thoughts. Thanks a lot!
Please login or create an account to join this discussion.
 
Go to topPage: 1